Tag Archives: The Federal Trade Commission

How to Check Your Child’s Credit Report

Originally published on CreditCards.com

Written by Dinah Wisenberg Brin

Parents place the utmost attention on their children’s safety, education, health and happiness, but even the most conscientious parent may overlook another matter that can affect their child’s future: the child’s credit report.

With some exceptions, most children under age 18 should not have a credit report at all. Minors, however, are not immune to identity theft and credit fraud. So you need to see if your youngster has a credit report – and you need to know what is on it.

“Ideally, and in the vast majority of instances, your child would not have a credit report,” says Rod Griffin, director of public education for credit reporting agency Experian. “It’s a good idea for a parent to check.”

Checking is especially important if you suspect your young child is the victim of identity theft. Teens also should check for credit reports in their names if they suspect someone may be using their identity and Social Security number to open fraudulent accounts.

Unless identity theft and credit fraud are caught and corrected, they can hinder a child’s ability to get loans, jobs or housing once they reach adulthood.

Protect your child’s financial future

In some cases, a child might legitimately have a credit report. For example, a teen might have one if a parent authorized him as a user on a credit card.

In most other cases, however, the existence of a credit report tied to a child is a sign of nefarious activity. Identity thieves can use a child’s Social Security number to open credit card accounts, apply for loans or government benefits or rent an apartment, the Federal Trade Commission notes.

“It’s a good idea to check whether your child has a credit report close to the child’s 16th birthday. If there is one – and it has errors due to fraud or misuse – you will have time to correct it before the child applies for a job, a loan for tuition or a car, or needs to rent an apartment,” the FTC says on its website.

Talk to your children about keeping their information safe: The Identity Theft Resource Center says you should tell your children they should try to avoid using their Social Security number, especially on the internet or when applying for financial aid or summer jobs. Parents and college-age kids should keep all sensitive information locked in a secure place, use a locked mailbox to send and receive mail, and take precautions when filling our forms for school and sports activities.

Do not delay if you see signs that credit thieves already have established a report in your child’s name.

The Identity Theft Resource Center cites several warning flags, including:

  • Calls from collection agencies, bills or credit cards sent to your home in your child’s name.
  • A child receiving preapproved credit card applications, or government notices related to taxes, benefits or even traffic violations.
  • A child having a bank account application denied because of poor credit history.
  • The mere existence of a credit report in the child’s name.

How to find a child’s credit status.

The three national credit-reporting companies – TransUnion, Equifax and Experian – do not knowingly keep data on children younger than 13, according to AnnualCreditReport.com.

That website – which is the official website where you can get free access to your credit reports – outlines steps to take if you suspect fraud involving your child’s identity. Such steps include alerting all three credit reporting agencies, filing a police report and filing a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. You also can file a complaint with the FTC. You can also call the Identity Theft Resource Center at 800-400-5530.


For example, each of the bureaus provides specific directions for requesting a minor child’s credit report. Making a request is the first step in clearing the record if an inaccurate or fraudulent file exists.

For more information, review our step-by-step instructions for requesting a child’s credit report from each bureau. Otherwise, below is a summary of the rules for the three credit bureau:

TransUnion offers an online form to help determine whether your child may be an identity theft victim. If the company finds a credit file on your child, it will seek more information from you.

Equifax instructs parents to contact its Minor Child Department in writing, and to provide copies of the child’s birth certificate and Social Security card, proof that you are the child’s parent or legal guardian, and a copy of your driver’s license or other government identification. Equifax says it will notify you and remove the child’s file if it exists.
Experian requires parents to mail in or digitally submit documentation if they want to know whether the company has a credit file on their child age 13 or younger. Experian provides a form for doing so. If a child does have a credit history, Griffin says, Experian will add a security alert to the file, include a note to say the child is a potential fraud victim, and freeze the file at no cost. When the child is older, he or she can lift the freeze and have access to his or her report, Griffin says. Check the credit freeze laws in your state by clicking here.

Family members and credit fraud

In some cases, family members themselves are the ones obtaining credit fraudulently in a child’s name. Foster children are particularly vulnerable to identity theft. “They’re a target, unfortunately, in many cases,” Griffin says.

Griffin has worked with teachers who try to help students to address fraud issues. In such cases, the minors may need to file police reports and affidavits against family members. “It’s a really heart-wrenching, difficult circumstance,” he says.

Federal law requires child welfare agencies to obtain annual credit reports for foster care youths ages 16 and older, and to help them clear up their records in cases of identity theft, according to the FTC.

Data breaches at health insurers and other companies also may expose children to identity theft. Do not ignore any notices you receive indicating that you or your family may have had personal information exposed in a data breach. Instead, respond appropriately, Griffin says. “You need to be actively engaged in protecting your information and your children’s,” he says.

Retail Tracking- “Who Knows Everything?” Book Excerpt

“Who Knows Everything?” is the title of my upcoming book about consumer privacy and the corporate spying. This book details the technology, strategies and depth of corporate spying. The objective of the book is to expose the incredible amount of information collected by corporations and the detail and intrusiveness of this relentless spying. In this chapter you get an idea of what is happening to you as you simply walk through a store. And there is no law against it.

Retail Tracking

You are being followed…everywhere!

If you think you can only be tracked online I have some bad news for you. Merchants have begun tracking customers while they’re in the store, walking near the store and or driving to the store. One method used to track customers is to track their cell phones. Stores use the Wi-Fi signals coming from the customer’s cellphone to track where they go in the store and what they look at. Major retailers such as Nordstrom, Family Dollar and Cabela’s are testing these technologies and using the information to make decisions like changing store layouts and to tailor coupon offerings. Apps such as Apple’s iBeacon are also used to track customers in stores.

But you need to understand how far this tracking goes. You don’t even have to be in the store to be followed.

A recent case settled by the Federal Trade Commission revealed really creepy technology being used by retailers.  According to the FTC sensor technology built by Nomi Technologies tracked the physical movement of more than nine million customers via their smartphones.

The tracking worked like this. Nomi’s technology tracked the smartphones of customers as the device searched for Wi-Fi signals inside stores or almost anywhere the owner went. Nomi stored this information making their equipment capable of tracking the movement of people throughout its clients’ retail outlets. This tracking information could also be used to track people’s shopping habits between stores.  The same MAC address appearing in several different stores reveals valuable information about the person whose smartphone possesses that address. Basically, you are being watched even if you are not in the store!

The FTC is not however accusing Nomi of providing anybody your individual information. But the agency did accuse Nomi of tracking consumers both inside and outside of its clients’ stores. According to the FTC Nomi allegedly,

  • Used the tracking information to inform its clients how many consumers passed by store entrances without entering.
  • How long people remained in stores.
  • How many people who entered a store had been in that store or other stores of the same chain within a certain period of time.
  • And various other forms of tracking data.

Is this illegal? No, retail tracking is not illegal. There is almost nothing in this book that’s illegal!

Many retailers use advanced methods and technologies to track customers including bionic mannequins. But the FTC took action because Nomi may not have informed, or even mislead consumers of the tracking. According to Nomi’s privacy policy consumers were supposed to be able to opt out of being tracked.  The consumer could use Nomi’s website or “at any retailer using Nomi’s technology” opt out. Nomi did provide an opt-out option on its website. But the FTC claims that at various stores using Nomi’s technology there were no disclosure notices that the technology was in use and no way for consumers to opt out.

Nomi’s settlement with the FTC was not exactly lenient. Nomi is prohibited from future misrepresentations and subject to twenty years of privacy audits and compliance oversight. In other words, they have to do a better job of informing the consumer they can opt out of this tracking. This means that much better notices must be posted at stores, and easier onsite opt-out options will be made available. Umm, have you see them?

How to hide from retail tracking

Consumers who do not wish to be tracked can change their phone setting to airplane mode or turn off the Wi-Fi. Politicians are becoming more aware of the tracking and have begun to take action. Although not a law, Sen. Charles Schumer of New York brokered a code of conduct aimed at companies that provide tracking technology and analytical services. The agreement allows consumers to opt out of tracking at SmartStorePrivacy.org.

Some stores use video to watch where consumers go inside the store and how long they stay there. Stores can also recognize returning shoppers because their mobile devices have unique identification codes recorded in their networks. Merchants can now study how repeat customers behave and measure how often the consumer visits the store.

Retail spying technology

But the spying technology does not stop with Wi-Fi signals, cell phones and cameras. Now stores are using the lighting to track shoppers. Philips Electronics has developed connected lighting to track you. Yeah, lights! The company unveiled a pilot of a connected in-store LED lighting system that communicates with a smartphone app using the store lights.

How does it work? The lights placed in the store are used as a data channel. Placed in a grid pattern the lights become a positioning system. The grid then locates the smartphone by determining which lights on the grid are closest.

Customers using an accompanying app can then receive alerts based on whatever the shopper is looking for. Let’s say the shopper has a shopping list for a particular recipe. The app, using the store lighting grid, can direct the shopper to the ingredients and offer relevant coupons for those ingredients. So even the lights in the store are watching you.

Just so you know this is an emerging technology. Philips is not alone in producing spy lighting. ByteLight of Boston is also selling light-based proximity beacons that link to a phone’s camera. ByteLight’s goal is to turn a room’s lighting fixtures into a data casting system.

You’re probably thinking; how far can this tracking technology go? How about heat tracking?

New camera-based technology helps retailers track what the customer touches, what they ignore, and where they walk. This helps merchants optimize the layout of the store. They use real-time imaging to track how shoppers move around the store. The information is converted into heat maps. It’s a high-tech way to determine what consumer’s buy and how.

Prism Skylabs is one of the companies offering this technology. The company also provides analytical data to retailers. The company uses real-time video recordings from in store cameras and analyzes shopper’s movements. They are looking for two things, where shoppers go in the store, and what they stop to touch or pick up.

But let’s get really creepy. Did you know stores use high tech cameras to watch you? Known as gaze trackers, these tiny cameras are hidden in tiny holes in the shelving and they detect which brands you’re looking at and how long you look at it. Remember those bionic mannequins I told you about? Well they have cameras mounted in their eyes that detect a customer’s age, sex, ethnicity, and facial expressions as they pass by. And there is no law that requires a store to tell you the cameras are there.

What does the merchant do with this information?  It is extremely important to know how to layout the store and place products based on popular vs. unpopular and expensive vs. less expensive merchandise. Merchants want to know where to put these products to make them more likely to be purchased. Placing a product in the right place in the store can make a big difference. Why do you think all those mints, gums, candy and magazines are waiting for you at the checkout? These items are classified as impulse buys. It’s the same reason all the children’s cereals are located below your eye level but right online with the kid’s eyes. Merchants can also charge for premium placement of retail products adding additional revenue streams.

Meanwhile, out in the parking lot.

 While you’re in the store, being spied on and followed around, other companies are cruising the parking lot collecting data.  An investigation into license plate scanning describes how companies are sending people out to drive around shopping center parking lots with cameras strapped to their car. They are supposedly looking for cars to repossess. However, these camera-equipped cars are photographing every license plate they see along with time and location data. The data is then sent off to brokers like Digital Recognition Network of Texas. This company claims to collect plate scans of 40 percent of all U.S. vehicles annually. I am pretty sure there are other companies that collect the other 60 percent of the plates. What do you think they are doing with that information?

These car-mounted cameras can snap more than 100 pictures of license plates every minute and sort them against a database of cars slated for repossession. Needless to say, the repo man’s job has become a lot easier.

These license plate pictures go into that commercial database. The image is accompanied by location data revealing where the picture was taken. That data is then sold to global information brokering companies. These companies, the same ones that provide credit checks and identity protection, are also selling license plate data revealing where you’ve been, accompanied by records about what you own, where you live and who you associate with.

That data’s life becomes endless in the systems of big data companies. Your license plate records are bundled with your other personal information and sold, over and over again.

The practical uses of all this combined information are endless and terrifying. What if your auto insurance company decided to track where you drive and decided they don’t like the neighborhoods you visit? They may see you as a risk. Jennifer Lynch of the Electronic Freedom Foundation said, “I would definitely be concerned with insurance companies getting access to this.”

Background checks performed by potential or current employers could reveal what businesses or establishments you frequent based on where your car is parked. A life insurance company could see for certain if you go to the gym on a regular basis as you claim by looking at data that shows if your car is in the gym lot regularly or not. What else could be learned just by tracking your car?

Digital Recognition Network, owner of the largest private database of license plate records, also collects data that’s used by law enforcement. Vigilant Solutions, an affiliate company, also provides license plate technology and data to law enforcement.

To ensure a steady stream of data DRN has contracts with 550 companies that hunt the streets across the nation with car-mounted, fast-action cameras.

What you have to understand is that the data that DRN and Vigilant Solutions collects is not connected to you right away. Refer back to the list of data points we talked about earlier in this book. Its after DRN sells the information that it becomes directly connected to you. Here’s another interesting fact, most people rarely travel more than twenty-five miles from home. Most of the businesses you frequent and places you go are fairly close to your residence. So, it’s pretty certain wherever your car is seen you live close by.

Your license plate data is combined with DMV information that finally identifies who owns the car. According to state contracts New York State DMV took in more than $4.3 million selling citizens personal DMV data in 2014 alone.

TransUnion, yeah the credit reporting people, is one of the companies that combines DMV records with license plate data and other records.

TransUnion demonstrated its top-of-the-line search that revealed how quickly a stranger can learn almost anything about you. Just entering your name in the search engine can reveal three months of location data on your car. The database will reveal what is at each location and plenty of personal information like your phone number, email addresses, social media accounts and home address. If that’s not enough the search engine will also expose your social network map, showing you, your family members, spouses, friends, acquaintances, etc. Are you sick yet?

License reader technology has become a favorite of law enforcement. But some police agencies, though required to delete this information, don’t. The Fairfax County, VA. police department was sued for violating a citizen’s privacy by retaining license plate data and even sharing it with other nearby police departments. According to Virginia law if the license plate data is not part of an ongoing investigation it must be destroyed within 24 hours.

A California man discovered that the local police department had collected images of his two cars 112 times in a database. He was shock to discover one image taken in 2009 that showed him and his two daughters getting out of one of his cars while it was parked in their driveway.

License plate data collection has become a concern not only for privacy advocates but the FBI as well. Internal documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union reveal that the FBI was instructed by its own lawyers to stop buying the devices for a time in 2012.

The FBI’s Office of General Counsel (OGC) was concerned about the agency’s use of the technology. The General Counsel focused on the lack of a clear government policy protecting the privacy of citizens whose vehicles are photographed by the readers. That concern prompted an order from the OGC to temporarily halt buying additional readers.

Is there any way you can avoid this level of spying? Probably not because someone already has your license plate in their database and it is probably connected to one or more of the profiles with your name on it.

However, you can eliminate the continued tracking of your vehicle by using devices that hide your license plates from cameras but not the naked eye. The filter fits over your license plate and clouds the image of your license plates from cameras. But to the human eye the filter is invisible. You can buy these devices online and at auto parts stores. Other devices use powerful flashes of light to blind traffic cameras. Some people have altered the license plate with tape or other items. This is almost always illegal.

Predicting Your Next Move

 Can marketers predict what you will do? Yes they can! Marketers can figure out, based on statistics and super sophisticated algorithms what you want to buy. Go back and read about Applied Predictive Technologies again. It’s called predictive technology and it’s catching on big time in the marketing industry. Why? Because marketers that use predictive technology have outperformed those who don’t. The bottom line is, competition.

But how does predictive technology work? Companies use super computers with highly sophisticated algorithms to calculate statistics and hundreds of variables. They use all the data they collect and create a pretty accurate model of what the consumer will do or how they will react to marketing efforts. It’s called data mining. Its information converted to numbers so computers can see into the future. But regardless of how advanced the technology is you’re still dealing with people. There are plenty of examples of people defying even the most precise computers and algorithms.

The government can’t but corporations can.

 The most troubling fact about the information you have already read is that the government is absolutely forbidden from investigating your life in the manner corporations do. Law enforcement needs to convince a judge that they need the information for a criminal investigation. They need a search warrant.

 The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, The Bill of Rights, guarantees protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Bill requires a judge to authorize any search and that there be a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and there is evidence of that crime.

No such law applies to corporations. They are free to investigate everything about you they wish. And they don’t have to tell you they are doing it nor do they have to reveal what they found. And, as we have said before, it really does not have to be correct.

And do I need to tell you that the government is buying this data? According to the World Privacy Forum the U.S. government began using a database called “The Work Number” in 2013. The database is owned by Equifax and contains 225 million active salary and employment records and 175 million historical records. Over 50,000 organizations use the database to verify employment and salary history. The company collects payroll data from thousands of U.S. employers and sells it to companies like credit card issuers, property managers, auto lenders, universities and governments at all levels. So, as you can see, the IRS is not the only agency that knows how much money you make.



Obama Pushes Consumer Privacy Bill

AP_barack_obama_press_conference_sk_131220_16x9_992President Obama has introduced draft legislation intended to ease the burden on consumers who wish to view or delete personal information that companies collect and keep. The White House announced the release of the draft based on the principles of the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights originally released in 2012.

Consumer privacy is another Internet related issue that Obama promised to address in his State of the Union address. The president previously released a fact sheet outlining both this and other proposed changes. President Obama has made significant efforts in addressing national cyber security and other consumer Internet related issues including connectivity and broadband, public private information sharing and data breach notification legislation.

The Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2015 addresses the staggering volume of personal data that corporations collect from consumers regularly. This data is the raw material used internally, analyzed by advertisers, or sold to a third-party aggregator as the final product of the information industry. The bill introduced by the president would require corporations to explain how they use this data in “concise and easily understandable” language. The bill also requires options for consumers to review, correct, or delete information.

Data covered by this bill includes names, addresses, social security or passport numbers, fingerprints, or credit card numbers. Excluded information includes “de-anonymized” data that theoretically cannot be traced back to a specific person. Information used to identify a cyber security related problem is also excluded as long as companies make “reasonable efforts” to remove any personally identifiable information. The bill requires companies to be specific about what information is collected, who it will be shared with, when and if it will be destroyed, how it’s kept secure, and how customers can see or remove it.

Data collectors will also be required to take “reasonable steps” to mitigate privacy risks and make these efforts clear to users. The  Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will be tasked with establishing rules for privacy reviews. Any company violating the terms of the act is subject to FTC lawsuits, as well as user and states attorney general action. The president’s bill allows exemptions for small businesses, including businesses that process data for 10,000 people a year or less or have no more than five employees.

California’s “Shine the Light” law already makes it possible to find out what information companies have collected. The California law requires companies to reveal what information they’ve sold to third-party marketing companies. Facebook, one of the largest data collectors in the world has already attempted to make their privacy policies more transparent considering the tremendous amount of information it holds.

Center on Privacy and Technology director Alvaro Bedoya at Georgetown’s law school worries that Obama’s bill could actually preempt state laws allowing companies to collect what they want as long as they maintain some level of transparency. Bedoya cites rules in Illinois and Texas that ban companies from collecting biometric information without permission. “This bill would erase those protections without offering any clear replacement.” He added that it “seems to assume a world where all of our data is collected about us, all of the time.”

Bedoya is not alone in his thinking. Nonprofit Consumer Watchdog labeled the bill as “full of loopholes” saying it “envisions a process where industry will dominate in developing codes of conduct.”

The Center for Digital Democracy says it relies too much on companies’ judgment to decide whether information is sensitive and how it should be managed. This limits the FTC’s power.

In a written statement the Center for Digital Democracy said “Although the president’s Privacy Bill of Rights promised transparency and control, it creates a labyrinth-like process that consumers must navigate before they can actually access and correct their own data records held by companies.”

The Center for Democracy and Technology says it “falls short on the privacy protections needed in today’s digital world.”

Bedoya hopes the bill that reaches Congress provides more specific and clear lines of authority, opening the door to meaningful reform. President Obama continues to push on other fronts.  This month he introduced another cybersecurity executive orderAnother attempt to create rules governing breaches like last year’s Sony hack.

Breaking It Down

As a black consumer you need to be aware of the level of data collection that is going on. Because the more corporations know about you the more likely they are to tailor offerings, sales, and information just for black people and that is not always a good thing. Not at all.

But before I get into the dangers of information collection let me explain a simple scary fact to you. Everything you buy is recorded somewhere with your name on it. You sell more information about yourself than you can imagine. What you don’t sell you give away or the major corporation figures out a way to steal it or buy it from someone else. Is this information about you true? Is it accurate and up to date? You don’t know and the information industry won’t let you see it. Major corporations are now collecting every bit of information they can about you. No matter where you are or who you are or what that information is. There is nothing to stop them. President Obama is trying to change that.

Now welcome to the age of digital discrimination. Corporations use the information they collect from black consumers to guide them to choices just for them. Sound familiar? Your information is used to direct you away from homes you can’t buy. That’s called red lining. your information is used to hide jobs you can’t have. Employment discrimination. Your information is used to decide what medical treatment you get and what you pay for prescriptions. Your information is used to determine what price you pay for merchandise and it is not always cheaper. Your information is used to decide what banks you can do business with, what loans you can get and what advertisements you see. Corporations claim its the machines doing it. Do we believe that?

The purpose of the Consumer Bill of Rights is to allow you some control over this information. But it is not going to solve the problem of digital discrimination.  I don’t know what will.